\ fr \ Federal Register Publications (CIS, ICE, CBP) \ Federal Register Publications (CIS, ICE, CBP) - 2004 \ FEDERAL REGISTER INTERIM REGULATIONS - 2004 \ Employment Authorization Documents [69 FR 45555] [FR 25-04]
Previous Document Next Document
Employment Authorization Documents [69 FR 45555] [FR 25-04]
DOCUMENT NUMBER:
FR 25-04
FEDERAL REGISTER CITE:
69 FR 45555
DATE OF PUBLICATION:
July 30, 2004
BILLING CODE: 4410-10
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Part 274a
[BCIS No. 2152-01]
RIN 1615-AA63
Employment Authorization Documents
AGENCY:
Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS.
ACTION:
Interim rule with request for comments.
SUMMARY:
This interim rule amends Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services (BCIS) regulations governing issuance of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs). Through this rule, BCIS will now establish EAD validity periods based on certain criteria, including: The applicant's immigration status; general processing time for the underlying application or petition; required background checks and response times for background checks by other agencies, as necessary; other security considerations and factors as dee
med appropriate by BCIS. BCIS will have discretion to modify EAD validity periods both for initial, renewal, and replacement cards. BCIS also will be able to establish EAD validity periods for classes of aliens and for individuals within those classes whose cases warrant a lesser validity period. The rule also removes current regulatory language limiting EAD validity periods to one-year increments for certain classes of aliens who are required to apply for employment authorization. Finally, the rule amends
BCIS regulations to reflect that BCIS will issue EADs to aliens granted asylum by the Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), with validity periods of up to five years, unless otherwise appropriate.
DATES:
Effective date
: This rule is effective July 30, 2004.
Comment date
: Written comments must be submitted on or before September 28, 2004.
ADDRESSES:
Please submit written comments to the Director, Regulations and Forms Services Division, Department of Homeland Security, 425 I Street, NW., Room 4034, Washington, DC 20536. To ensure proper handling, please reference BCIS No. 2152-01 in your correspondence. You may also submit comments electronically at:
rfs.regs@dhs.gov
. When submitting comments electronically, you must include CIS No. 2152-01 in the subject box. Comments are available for public inspection at the above address by calling (202) 514-3291 to arrange for an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan Mills, Residence and Status Services, Office of Program and Regulations Development, Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 425 “I” Street, NW., ULLICO Building, Third Floor, Washington, DC 20536, telephone (202) 514-4754.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Who Is Affected by This Rule?
This interim rule affects aliens who are required to apply for employment authorization or, if employment authorized incident to immigration status, to apply for evidence of employment authorization. This interim rule also affects aliens who have been granted asylum by EOIR and wish to obtain evidence of employment authorization.
What Are the Current Requirements for EAD Issuance?
Under 8 CFR 274a.12(a), certain aliens are authorized employment incident to their immigration status (e.g., lawful permanent residents, lawful temporary residents, parolees, aliens in Temporary Protected Status, etc.). Such aliens are eligible to work in the United States regardless of whether they receive an EAD. However, these aliens must apply to BCIS to receive an EAD evidencing their employment authorization. Under 8 CFR 274a.12(c), certain aliens are required to apply for employment authorization bef
ore they may begin to work in the U.S. (e.g., students seeking to perform optical practical training, aliens with pending applications for adjustment of status, etc.). Such aliens must apply to BCIS to receive an EAD authorizing them to work in the United States, as well as evidencing the fact that they are employment authorized.
With limited exceptions, most classes of aliens who are employment authorized under 8 CFR 274a.12(a) or 274a.12(c) are required to apply for employment authorization using the Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization. If BCIS approves the Form I-765, it will issue an EAD. For certain categories, the current regulations specifically limit the EAD validity period to one-year increments. In all other instances, and with limited exceptions, BCIS through policy has set EAD validity periods at one yea
r.
Why Is BCIS Removing the Current Regulatory and Policy Limitations on EAD Validity Periods?
These regulatory and policy limitations often require an alien whose underlying status is longer than one year, or whose underlying application will remain pending with BCIS for longer than one year, to apply for renewal of the EAD every year, creating a burden on the applicant and an additional workload for BCIS. This rule gives BCIS the discretion and flexibility to modify EAD validity periods for initial, renewal, and replacement cards. BCIS also will establish EAD validity periods for classes of aliens
and will preserve the discretion to establish validity periods of varying lengths for individuals within those classes whose cases warrant a lesser validity period. BCIS will issue field guidance to ensure that adjudicators use standard criteria when exercising their discretion in establishing EAD validity periods.
For aliens who are employment authorized incident to status, BCIS does not contemplate issuing employment authorization documents that would expire only upon expiration of the alien's status. BCIS must reserve the right to periodically expire such documents and, where appropriate, issue new cards. This will allow BCIS to address any security concerns and to ensure the integrity of the EADs process by preventing fraud or misuse of such documents. BCIS intends to review all classes of aliens who are employmen
t authorized to determine a general validity period for each class. For example, currently BCIS issues permanent resident cards (Form I-551) with ten-year validity periods. Similarly, BCIS intends to issue EADs to asylees with a validity period of five years, unless otherwise appropriate. An expiration date on the card reflects only that the card must be renewed, not that the bearer's work authorization has expired.
What Does This Rule Implement?
This interim rule amends 8 CFR 274a.12(a) and (c) to eliminate provisions in the regulations that provide a maximum validity period for certain EADs. This rule also amends 8 CFR 274a.12(a)(5) to reflect that BCIS will issue initial EADs to aliens granted asylum by the EOIR with validity periods of up to five years, unless otherwise appropriate.
Good Cause Exception
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has determined that good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3) to make this rule effective July 30, 2004, for the following reasons: BCIS is modifying the regulations at 8 CFR 274a.12(a)(5) and 274a.13(a) to facilitate BCIS' immediate compliance with its statutory obligation under the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act (“Border Security Act”), Pub. L. 107-173, 116 Stat. 543, 556-57; 8 U.S.C. 1158(c)(1)(B), which became effective in May 200
2. The Border Security Act requires BCIS to provide asylees with initial evidence of employment authorization. BCIS also is removing the regulatory limitations on certain classes of one-year maximum validity periods to allow BCIS to set more flexible EAD periods. In certain instances, BCIS will be able to set validity periods for longer than one year, thereby benefiting the aliens and reducing BCIS workload associated with yearly EAD issuance. The delay in the implementation of this interim rule for conside
ration of public comments prior to the effective date of the rule will serve only to increase the current backlog of EAD applications. Accordingly, DHS finds that it would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest to delay the implementation of this rule to allow the prior notice and comment period normally required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and(d)(3). DHS nevertheless invites written comments on this interim rule and will consider any timely comments in preparing a final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will have a positive significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses described in the Regulatory Flexibility Act at 5 U.S.C. 605.
With this rule, DHS addresses security concerns and improves BCIS efficiency by giving BCIS more flexibility in determining the appropriate validity period for EADs. Due to security concerns, DHS does not wish to have EADs issued with a validity period that is significantly longer than the immigration status or processing time of the application that the EAD is based upon. However, the validity period needs to be long enough to significantly lessen the burden created by the filing, adjudication, and issuanc
e of EAD renewals. Removing this burden will allow BCIS to better focus its policy and resources upon improving the security and integrity of EADs and the security, integrity, and efficiency of BCIS application processes.
In accordance with the President's long-term goal of a standard BCIS application processing time of six months, this rule is forward-looking, giving BCIS the flexibility to lessen the validity period of affected EADs as BCIS processing times make progress toward and then reach the President's goal.
Considering all of these factors, DHS believes that a flexible validity period established by policy and taking into account security considerations, application processing times, and other factors is more appropriate than the inflexible validity periods contained in the regulatory provisions in place prior to this interim rule.
This change will decrease costs for affected applicants in so far as they will be required to pay the $175 filing fee for the I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, in order to renew their EAD less frequently or, in some situations, not at all.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is considered by DHS to be an economically significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review.
Obtaining and then presenting an EAD to an employer is how many aliens verify their identity and employment authorization as required by Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification. To obtain an EAD, an applicant must submit a Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization Document, to the appropriate BCIS service center or district office, along with a $175 fee or request for a fee waiver. The fee is necessary to comply with Public Law 100-459, which requires BCIS to prescribe and collect fees to r
ecover the full cost of processing immigration and naturalization applications, petitions, and associated support benefits. An applicant who cannot afford to pay the fee may submit a fee waiver request by following the instructions in 8 CFR 103.7(c). Therefore, the cost of filing each EAD renewal application is approximately $175.
This regulation removes regulatory provisions limiting the validity period for some EADs. At present, BCIS receives more than 950,000 Form I-765 applications for EAD renewal per year. The removal of the regulatory provisions limiting EADs to no more than one year of validity will have no effect by itself. However, there would be an economically significant benefit stemming from the projected BCIS policy change to a process where the validity period of these and certain other EAD categories are established b
ased on based upon security concerns, the underlying application or status, and other appropriate factors.
This policy change would reduce the number of Form I-765 applications for EAD renewal in the future. BCIS cannot yet estimate the magnitude of this reduction because the policy change is still under development. However, BCIS does plan to compensate for the lack of a yearly EAD renewal application from affected aliens by ensuring that certain security and background checks are generally completed prior to issuance of EAD that is valid for more than one year.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.
Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.