Skip to main content
This is the USCIS preview website. Visit uscis.gov for the official USCIS site.
USCIS Response to Coronavirus (COVID-19)
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government    Here's how you know
Español
Multilingual Resources
Official Government Website

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure Website

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( A locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Seal, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
 
Sign In  
Access USCIS online services.
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
Sign In
Create Account
Horizontal Menu
  • Topics
  • Forms
  • Newsroom
  • Citizenship
  • Green Card
  • Laws
  • Tools
  • Contact us
  • Multilingual Resources
  • Ask Emma
Policy Manual
Contents
Updates
INA
8 CFR
Glossary
Feedback
 
 
Book outline for Policy Manual
  • Policy Manual
    • Search
    • Updates
    • Table of Contents
    • Volume 1 - General Policies and Procedures
    • Volume 2 - Nonimmigrants
      • Part A - Nonimmigrant Policies and Procedures
      • Part B - Diplomatic and International Organization Personnel (A, G)
      • Part C - Visitors for Business or Tourism (B)
      • Part D - Exchange Visitors (J)
      • Part E - Cultural Visitors (Q)
      • Part F - Students (F, M)
      • Part G - Treaty Traders and Treaty Investors (E-1, E-2)
      • Part H - Specialty Occupation Workers (H-1B, E-3)
      • Part I - Temporary Agricultural and Nonagricultural Workers (H-2)
      • Part J - Trainees (H-3)
      • Part K - Media Representatives (I)
      • Part L - Intracompany Transferees (L)
      • Part M - Nonimmigrants of Extraordinary Ability or Achievement (O)
        • Chapter 1 - Purpose and Background
        • Chapter 2 - Eligibility for O Classification
        • Chapter 3 - Petitioners
        • Chapter 4 - O-1 Beneficiaries
        • Chapter 5 - O-2 Beneficiaries
        • Chapter 6 - Family Members
        • Chapter 7 - Documentation and Evidence
        • Chapter 8 - Adjudication
        • Chapter 9 - Admission, Extension of Stay, Change of Status, and Change of Employer
      • Part N - Athletes and Entertainers (P)
      • Part O - Religious Workers (R)
      • Part P - NAFTA Professionals (TN)
      • Part Q - Nonimmigrants Intending to Adjust Status (K, V)
    • Volume 3 - Humanitarian Protection and Parole
    • Volume 4 - Refugees and Asylees
    • Volume 5 - Adoptions
    • Volume 6 - Immigrants
    • Volume 7 - Adjustment of Status
    • Volume 8 - Admissibility
    • Volume 9 - Waivers and Other Forms of Relief
    • Volume 10 - Employment Authorization
    • Volume 11 - Travel and Identity Documents
    • Volume 12 - Citizenship and Naturalization
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Policy Manual
  3. Volume 2 - Nonimmigrants
  4. Part M - Nonimmigrants of Extraordinary Ability or Achievement (O)

Part M - Nonimmigrants of Extraordinary Ability or Achievement (O)

Content navigation tabs
  • Guidance
  • Resources (41)
  • Appendices (1)
  • Updates (7)
  • History (0)

Resources

Legal Authorities

59 FR 41818 (PDF) - Temporary Alien Workers Seeking H-1B, O, and P Classifications Under the Immigration and Nationality Act--Correction

8 CFR 103.2(a)(1) - Submission and adjudication of benefit requests

8 CFR 103.2(b)(19) - Notification

8 CFR 103.2(b)(8) - Request for Evidence

8 CFR 103.3 - Denials, appeals, and precedent decisions

8 CFR 214.1(c)(5) - Decision in Form I-129 or I-539 extension proceedings

8 CFR 214.1(l)(2) - Period of stay

8 CFR 214.2(o) - Special requirements for admission, extension, and maintenance of status (aliens of extraordinary ability or achievement)

8 CFR 214.2(o)(1)(i) - Aliens of extraordinary ability or achievement

8 CFR 214.2(o)(1)(ii)(A)(1) - Description of classifications, extraordinary ability

8 CFR 214.2(o)(1)(ii)(A)(2) - Description of classifications, extraordinary achievement

8 CFR 214.2(o)(1)(ii)(B) - O2 classification

8 CFR 214.2(o)(10) - Admission

8 CFR 214.2(o)(12)(ii) - Extension period

8 CFR 214.2(o)(13) - Effect of approval of a permanent labor certification or filing of a preference petition on O classification

8 CFR 214.2(o)(16) - Return transportation requirement

8 CFR 214.2(o)(2) - Filing of petitions

8 CFR 214.2(o)(2)(ii)(C) - Evidence required to accompany a petition

8 CFR 214.2(o)(2)(iv) - Other filing situations

8 CFR 214.2(o)(2)(iv)(B) - Services for more than one employer

8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(ii) - Definitions

8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii) - Evidentiary criteria for an O-1 alien of extraordinary ability in the fields of science, education, business, or athletics

8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iv) - Evidentiary criteria for an O-1 alien of extraordinary ability in the arts

8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(v) - Evidentiary criteria for an alien of extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry

8 CFR 214.2(o)(4) - Petition for an O-2 accompanying alien

8 CFR 214.2(o)(5) - Consultation

8 CFR 214.2(o)(6)(iii) - Approval and validity of petition

8 CFR 214.2(o)(6)(iv) - Approval and validity of petition

8 CFR 214.2(o)(7) - Notification of Decision

8 CFR 214.2(o)(8)(ii) - Automatic Revocation

8 CFR 214.2(o)(9)(ii) - Appeal of Revocation

8 CFR 248.1(a) - Change of Nonimmigrant Classification-General

8 CFR 248.3(a) - Requests by petitioners

8 CFR 248.3(g) - Denial of application

8 CFR 274a.12 - Classes of aliens authorized to accept employment

INA 101(a)(15)(O) - Extraordinary ability in arts or athletics

INA 101(a)(46) - Definition of “extraordinary ability” in the arts

INA 214(c) - Admission of nonimmigrants

Forms

G-1055, Fee Schedule

I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker

I-539, Application To Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status Application To Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status

Appendices

Appendix: Satisfying the O-1A Evidentiary Requirements
Satisfying the O-1A Evidentiary Requirements
O-1A Evidentiary Criterion Relevant Examples and Considerations
Documentation of the beneficiary’s receipt of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor.[1]

Examples:

  • Awards from well-known national institutions and well-known professional associations.

  • Certain doctoral dissertation awards and Ph.D. scholarships.

  • Certain awards recognizing presentations at nationally or internationally recognized conferences.

Considerations:

While many scholastic awards do not have the requisite level of recognition, there are some Ph.D. scholarships or dissertation awards, for example, that are nationally or internationally recognized as awards for excellence such that they may satisfy the requirements of this criterion. Relevant considerations include, but are not limited to:

  • The criteria use to grant the awards or prizes;

  • The national or international significance of the awards or prizes in the field;

  • The number of awardees or prize recipients; and

  • Limitations on eligible competitors.

For example, an award available only to persons within a single locality, employer, or school may have little national or international recognition, while an award open to members of a well-known national institution (including an R1 or R2 doctoral university[2]) or professional organization may be nationally recognized.

Documentation of the beneficiary’s membership in associations in the field for which classification is sought, which require outstanding achievements of their members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their disciplines or fields.[3]

Examples:

  • Membership in certain professional associations.

  • Fellowships with certain organizations or institutions.

Considerations:

The petitioner must show that membership in the association requires outstanding achievements in the field for which classification is sought, as judged by recognized national or international experts.

Associations may have multiple levels of membership. The petitioner must show that in order to obtain the level of membership afforded to the beneficiary, the beneficiary was judged by recognized national or international experts as having attained outstanding achievements in the field for which classification is sought.

As a possible example, membership in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) at the IEEE fellow level requires, in part, that a nominee have “accomplishments that have contributed importantly to the advancement or application of engineering, science and technology, bringing the realization of significant value to society,” and nominations are judged by an IEEE council of experts and a committee of current IEEE fellows.[4] As another possible example, membership as a fellow in the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) is based on recognition of a nominee’s “significant, sustained contributions” to the field of artificial intelligence, and is judged by a panel of current AAAI fellows.[5]

Relevant factors that may lead an officer to a conclusion that the person's membership in one or more associations was not based on outstanding achievements in the field include, but are not limited to, instances where the person's membership was based:

  • Solely on a level of education or years of experience in a particular field;

  • On the payment of a fee or by subscribing to an association's publications; or

  • On a requirement, compulsory or otherwise, for employment in certain occupations, such as union membership.

Published material in professional or major trade publications or major media about the beneficiary, relating to the beneficiary's work in the field for which classification is sought. This evidence must include the title, date, and author of such published material and any necessary translation.[6]

Examples:

  • Professional or major print publications (newspaper articles, popular and academic journal articles, books, textbooks, or similar publications) regarding the beneficiary and the beneficiary’s work.

  • Professional or major online publications regarding the beneficiary and the beneficiary’s work.

  • Transcript of professional or major audio or video coverage of the beneficiary and the beneficiary’s work.

Considerations:

Published material that includes only a brief citation or passing reference to the beneficiary’s work is not “about” the beneficiary, relating to the beneficiary’s work in the field, as required under this criterion. However, the beneficiary and the beneficiary’s work need not be the only subject of the material; published material that covers a broader topic but includes a substantial discussion of the beneficiary’s work in the field and mentions the beneficiary in connection to the work may be considered material “about” the beneficiary relating to their work.

Moreover, officers may consider material that focuses solely or primarily on work or research being undertaken by a team of which the beneficiary is a member, provided that the material mentions the beneficiary in connection with the work, or other evidence in the record documents the beneficiary’s significant role in the work or research.

In evaluating whether a submitted publication is a professional publication, major trade publication, or major media, relevant factors include the intended audience (for professional and major trade publications) and the relative circulation, readership, or viewership (for major trade publications and other major media).

Evidence of the beneficiary's participation on a panel, or individually, as a judge of the work of others in the same or in an allied field of specialization for which classification is sought.[7]

Examples:

  • Reviewer of abstracts or papers submitted for presentation at scholarly conferences in the respective field.

  • Peer reviewer for scholarly publications.

  • Member of doctoral dissertation committees.

  • Peer reviewer for government research funding programs.

Considerations:

The petitioner must show that the beneficiary has not only been invited to judge the work of others, but also that the beneficiary actually participated in the judging of the work of others in the same or allied field of specialization.

For example, a petitioner might document a beneficiary’s peer review work by submitting a copy of a request from a journal to the beneficiary to do the review, accompanied by evidence confirming that the beneficiary actually completed the review.

Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field.[8]

Examples:

  • Published materials about the significance of the beneficiary’s original work.

  • Testimonials, letters, and affidavits about the beneficiary’s original work.

  • Documentation that the beneficiary’s original work was cited at a level indicative of major significance in the field.

  • Patents or licenses deriving from the beneficiary’s work or evidence of commercial use of the beneficiary’s work.

Considerations:

Analysis under this criterion focuses on whether the beneficiary’s original work constitutes major, significant contributions to the field.

Evidence that the beneficiary’s work was funded, patented, or published, while potentially demonstrating the work’s originality, will not necessarily establish, on its own, that the work is of major significance to the field. However, published research that has provoked widespread commentary on its importance from others working in the field, and documentation that it has been highly cited relative to other works in that field, may be probative of the significance of the beneficiary’s contributions to the field of endeavor.

Similarly, evidence that the beneficiary developed a patented technology that has attracted significant attention or commercialization may establish the significance of the beneficiary’s original contribution to the field. If a patent remains pending, USCIS will likely require additional supporting evidence to document the originality of the beneficiary’s contribution.

Detailed letters from experts in the field explaining the nature and significance of the beneficiary’s contribution(s) may also provide valuable context for evaluating the claimed original contributions of major significance, particularly when the record includes documentation corroborating the claimed significance.

Submitted letters should specifically describe the beneficiary’s contribution and its significance to the field and should also set forth the basis of the writer’s knowledge and expertise.

Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional journals, or other major media.[9]

Examples:

  • Publications in professionally-relevant journals.

  • Published conference presentations at nationally or internationally recognized conferences.[10]

Considerations:

In order to meet this criterion, the beneficiary must be a listed author of the submitted article(s) but need not be the sole or first author. In addition, a petitioner need not provide evidence that the beneficiary’s published work has been cited to meet this criterion.[11]

In addition, the articles must be scholarly. In the academic arena, a scholarly article reports on original research, experimentation, or philosophical discourse. It is written by a researcher or expert in the field who is often affiliated with a college, university, or research institution and the article is normally peer-reviewed.

In general, it should have footnotes, endnotes, or a bibliography, and may include graphs, charts, videos, or pictures as illustrations of the concepts expressed in the article. In non-academic arenas, a scholarly article should be written for learned persons in that field.

In evaluating whether a submitted publication is a professional publication or major media, relevant factors include the intended audience (for professional journals) and the circulation or readership relative to other media in the field (for major media).

Evidence that the beneficiary has been employed in a critical or essential capacity for organizations and establishments that have a distinguished reputation.[12]

Examples:

  • Senior faculty or senior research position for a distinguished academic department or program.

  • Senior research position for a distinguished non-academic institution or company.

  • Principal or named investigator for a department, institution, or business that received a merit-based government award, such as an academic research or Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant.[13]

  • Member of a key committee within a distinguished organization.

  • Founder or co-founder of, or contributor of intellectual property to, a startup business that has a distinguished reputation.

  • Critical or essential supporting role for a distinguished organization or a distinguished division of an institution or company, as explained in detail by the director or a principal investigator of the relevant organization or division.

Considerations:

To show a critical role, the evidence should establish that the beneficiary has contributed in a way that is of significant importance to the organization or establishment’s activities. To show an essential role, the evidence should establish that the beneficiary’s role is (or was) integral to the entity. A leadership role in an organization often qualifies as critical or essential.

For a supporting role to be considered critical or essential, USCIS considers other factors, such as whether the beneficiary’s performance in the role is (or was) integral or important to the organization or establishment’s goals or activities, especially in relation to others in similar positions within the organization.

It is not the title of the beneficiary’s role, but rather the beneficiary’s duties and performance in the role that determines whether the role is (or was) critical or essential. Detailed letters from persons with personal knowledge of the significance of the beneficiary’s role can be particularly helpful in analyzing this criterion. The organization need not have directly employed the beneficiary.

In addition, the organization or establishment must be recognized as having a distinguished reputation. Relevant factors for evaluating the reputation of an organization or establishment can include the scale of its customer base, longevity, or relevant media coverage.

For academic departments, programs, and institutions, officers may also consider national rankings and receipt of government research grants as positive factors in some cases.

For a startup business, officers may consider evidence that the business has received significant funding from government entities, venture capital funds, angel investors, or other such funders commensurate with funding rounds generally achieved for that startup’s stage and industry, as a positive factor regarding its distinguished reputation.

Evidence that the beneficiary has either commanded a high salary or will command a high salary or other remuneration for services as evidenced by contracts or other reliable evidence.[14]

Examples:

  • Tax returns, pay statements, or other evidence of past salary or remuneration for services.

  • Contract, job offer letter, or other evidence of prospective salary or remuneration for services.

  • Comparative wage or remuneration data for the beneficiary’s field, such as geographical or position-appropriate compensation surveys.

Considerations:

If the petitioner is claiming to meet this criterion, then the burden is on the petitioner to provide appropriate evidence establishing that the beneficiary’s compensation is high relative to others working in similar occupations in the field. The following webpages, among others, may be helpful in evaluating the relative compensation for a given field:

  • The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Overview of BLS Wage Data by Area and Occupation webpage; and

  • The Department of Labor's Career One Stop webpage.

Officers should evaluate persons working outside of the United States based on the wage statistics or comparable evidence for that locality, rather than by simply converting the salary to U.S. dollars and then viewing whether that salary would be considered high in the United States.

For entrepreneurs or founders of startup businesses, officers consider evidence that the business has received significant funding from government entities, venture capital funds, angel investors, or other such funders in evaluating the credibility of submitted contracts, job offer letters, or other evidence of prospective salary or remuneration for services.

Footnotes


[^ 1] 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(1).

[^ 2] The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education recognizes R1 and R2 doctoral universities as having “very high” or “high” research activity, respectively, based on publicly available federal government data regarding the number of doctoral degrees awarded and the amount of total research expenditures. See the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education’s Basic Classification Description webpage.

[^ 3] 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(2).

[^ 4] See the IEEE’s Steps to Become an IEEE Fellow webpage.

[^ 5] See the AAAI Fellows Program webpage.

[^ 6] See 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(3).

[^ 7] See 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(4).

[^ 8] See 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(5).

[^ 9] See 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(6).

[^ 10] While many articles accepted for presentation at conferences do not result in publication, there are conferences that peer review and publish accepted presentations in professional journals (sometimes called proceedings), such that they may qualify as scholarly articles under this criterion.

[^ 11] Instead, officers may consider citation evidence relating to the published work as part of the totality analysis to evaluate whether the record establishes that the beneficiary has sustained national or international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the top of the field. For instance, documentation regarding the total rate of citations to the beneficiary’s body of published work relative to others in the field may indicate a beneficiary’s high overall standing for the purpose of demonstrating that the beneficiary is among the small percentage at the top of the field.

[^ 12] See 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(7).

[^ 13] See SBIR America’s Seed Fund webpage.

[^ 14] See 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii)(B)(8).

Updates

POLICY ALERT - O-1 Nonimmigrant Status for Persons of Extraordinary Ability or Achievement

January 21, 2022

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is issuing policy guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual to clarify how USCIS evaluates evidence to determine eligibility for O-1A nonimmigrants of extraordinary ability, with a focus on persons in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) fields, as well as how USCIS determines whether an O-1 beneficiary’s prospective work is within the beneficiary’s area of extraordinary ability or achievement.

Read More
Affected Sections

2 USCIS-PM M.4 - Chapter 4 - O-1 Beneficiaries

POLICY ALERT - Determining the Appropriate O-1B Classification for Persons of Extraordinary Ability in the Arts or Extraordinary Achievement in the Motion Picture or Television Industry

January 13, 2022

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is issuing policy guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual to clarify how USCIS determines whether an O-1B beneficiary is evaluated as a person of extraordinary ability in the arts (O-1B Arts) or as a person of extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry (O-1B MPTV).

Read More
Affected Sections

2 USCIS-PM M.4 - Chapter 4 - O-1 Beneficiaries

Technical Update - Replacing the Term “Alien”

May 11, 2021

This technical update replaces all instances of the term “alien” with “noncitizen” or other appropriate terms throughout the Policy Manual where possible, as used to refer to a person who meets the definition provided in INA 101(a)(3) [“any person not a citizen or national of the United States”].

Affected Sections

1 USCIS-PM - Volume 1 - General Policies and Procedures

2 USCIS-PM - Volume 2 - Nonimmigrants

6 USCIS-PM - Volume 6 - Immigrants

7 USCIS-PM - Volume 7 - Adjustment of Status

8 USCIS-PM - Volume 8 - Admissibility

9 USCIS-PM - Volume 9 - Waivers and Other Forms of Relief

10 USCIS-PM - Volume 10 - Employment Authorization

11 USCIS-PM - Volume 11 - Travel and Identity Documents

12 USCIS-PM - Volume 12 - Citizenship and Naturalization

POLICY ALERT - O Nonimmigrant Visa Classification

September 17, 2020

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is issuing policy guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual to update and consolidate guidance related to O nonimmigrant classifications.

Read More
Affected Sections

2 USCIS-PM M - Part M - Nonimmigrants of Extraordinary Ability or Achievement (O)

POLICY ALERT - Fee Schedule and Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements Final Rule

September 02, 2020

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is revising its policy guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual to align with the Fee Schedule and Changes to Certain Other Immigration Benefit Request Requirements Final Rule, published in the Federal Register on August 3, 2020. This guidance becomes effective October 2, 2020. For information regarding implementation, see Appendix: 2020 Fee Rule Litigation Summary.

Read More
Affected Sections

1 USCIS-PM A - Part A - Public Services

1 USCIS-PM B - Part B - Submission of Benefit Requests

2 USCIS-PM - Volume 2 - Nonimmigrants

7 USCIS-PM A - Part A - Adjustment of Status Policies and Procedures

7 USCIS-PM F - Part F - Special Immigrant-Based (EB-4) Adjustment

7 USCIS-PM M - Part M - Asylee Adjustment

11 USCIS-PM A - Part A - Secure Identity Documents Policies and Procedures

Technical Update - Moving the Adjudicator’s Field Manual Content into the USCIS Policy Manual

May 21, 2020

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is updating and incorporating relevant Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) content into the USCIS Policy Manual. As that process is ongoing, USCIS has moved any remaining AFM content to its corresponding USCIS Policy Manual Part, in PDF format, until relevant AFM content has been properly incorporated into the USCIS Policy Manual. To the extent that a provision in the USCIS Policy Manual conflicts with remaining AFM content or Policy Memoranda, the updated information in the USCIS Policy Manual prevails. To find remaining AFM content, see the crosswalk (PDF, 331.55 KB) between the AFM and the Policy Manual.

Affected Sections

1 USCIS-PM - Volume 1 - General Policies and Procedures

2 USCIS-PM - Volume 2 - Nonimmigrants

3 USCIS-PM - Volume 3 - Humanitarian Protection and Parole

4 USCIS-PM - Volume 4 - Refugees and Asylees

5 USCIS-PM - Volume 5 - Adoptions

6 USCIS-PM - Volume 6 - Immigrants

7 USCIS-PM - Volume 7 - Adjustment of Status

8 USCIS-PM - Volume 8 - Admissibility

9 USCIS-PM - Volume 9 - Waivers and Other Forms of Relief

11 USCIS-PM - Volume 11 - Travel and Identity Documents

12 USCIS-PM - Volume 12 - Citizenship and Naturalization

Technical Update - Replacing the Term “Foreign National”

October 08, 2019

This technical update replaces all instances of the term “foreign national” with “alien” throughout the Policy Manual as used to refer to a person who meets the definition provided in INA 101(a)(3) [“any person not a citizen or national of the United States”].

Affected Sections

1 USCIS-PM - Volume 1 - General Policies and Procedures

2 USCIS-PM - Volume 2 - Nonimmigrants

6 USCIS-PM - Volume 6 - Immigrants

7 USCIS-PM - Volume 7 - Adjustment of Status

8 USCIS-PM - Volume 8 - Admissibility

9 USCIS-PM - Volume 9 - Waivers and Other Forms of Relief

10 USCIS-PM - Volume 10 - Employment Authorization

11 USCIS-PM - Volume 11 - Travel and Identity Documents

12 USCIS-PM - Volume 12 - Citizenship and Naturalization

Version History

No historical versions available.

0 0
Page sub tree links
  • Chapter 1 - Purpose and Background
  • Chapter 2 - Eligibility for O Classification
  • Chapter 3 - Petitioners
  • Chapter 4 - O-1 Beneficiaries
  • Chapter 5 - O-2 Beneficiaries
  • Chapter 6 - Family Members
  • Chapter 7 - Documentation and Evidence
  • Chapter 8 - Adjudication
  • Chapter 9 - Admission, Extension of Stay, Change of Status, and Change of Employer
Current as of June 24, 2022
Back
Next
Was this page helpful?
0 / 2000
To protect your privacy, please do not include any personal information in your feedback. Review our Privacy Policy.
Return to top
  • Topics
  • Forms
  • Newsroom
  • Citizenship
  • Green Card
  • Laws
  • Tools
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Seal, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Instagram
LinkedIn
Email
Contact USCIS
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Seal

USCIS.gov

An official website of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Important links
  • About USCIS
  • Accessibility
  • Budget and Performance
  • DHS Components
  • Freedom of Information Act
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Privacy and Legal Disclaimers
  • Site Map
  • Office of the Inspector General
  • The White House
  • USA.gov
Looking for U.S. government information and services?
Visit USA.gov