Chapter 9 - Death of Petitioner or Principal Beneficiary
In the past, a petition could not be approved if the petitioner died while the petition remained pending.  In 2009, Congress addressed this scenario with a new statutory provision, INA 204(l).  This provision gave aliens the ability to seek an immigration benefit through a deceased qualifying relative in certain circumstances.
An officer may approve an adjustment application, certain petitions, and related applications adjudicated on or after October 28, 2009,  if:
The applicant resided in the United States when the qualifying relative died;
The applicant continues to reside in the United States on the date of the decision on the pending application; and
The applicant is at least one of the following:
A beneficiary of a pending or approved immediate relative immigrant visa petition;
A beneficiary of a pending or approved family-based immigrant visa petition, including both the principal beneficiary and any derivative beneficiaries;
Any derivative beneficiary of a pending or approved employment-based immigrant visa petition;
The beneficiary of a pending or approved Refugee/Asylee Relative Petition (Form I-730);
An alien admitted as a derivative T or U nonimmigrant; or
A derivative asylee. 
This applies to an adjustment of status application adjudicated on or after October 28, 2009, even if the qualifying relative died before October 28, 2009. If a petition or application was denied on or after October 28, 2009, without considering the effect of INA 204(l), and INA 204(l) could have permitted approval, USCIS must, on its own motion, reopen the case for a new decision in light of this new law.
An alien’s deceased relative must meet the definition of qualifying relative in order for the alien to be eligible to seek an immigration benefit through that person.
Although Congress did not expressly define “qualifying relative” in this situation, it did provide a list of aliens who may seek an immigration benefit through the qualifying relative.  Therefore, for purposes of seeking adjustment of status, USCIS infers that qualifying relative means a person who, immediately before death, was:
The petitioner in an immediate relative immigrant visa petition;
The petitioner in a family-based immigrant visa petition;
The principal beneficiary in a widow(er)’s immediate relative immigrant visa petition;
The principal beneficiary in a widow(er)’s family-based immigrant visa petition;
The principal beneficiary in an employment-based immigrant visa petition;
The petitioner in a Refugee/Asylee Relative Petition (Form I-730);
The principal alien admitted as a T or U nonimmigrant; or
The principal asylee granted asylum.
An applicant must have resided in the United States when the qualifying relative died, and continues to reside in the United States to adjust status based on the deceased qualifying relative. 
INA 204(l) defines an applicant’s residence as his or her “principal, actual dwelling place in fact, without regard to intent.”  If the applicant’s residence was in the United States at the required times, the applicant meets the residency requirement.
An applicant who was temporarily abroad when the qualifying relative died does not need to prove that he or she still resides in the United States. Further, the statutory definition of residence does not require the applicant to show that his or her presence in the United States is lawful. Execution of a removal order, however, terminates an alien’s residence in the United States.
For purposes of derivative beneficiaries,  as long as any one surviving beneficiary of a covered petition meets the residence requirement, then the petition may be approved despite the death of the qualifying relative. All the beneficiaries may immigrate to the same extent that would have been permitted if the qualifying relative had not died.  It is not necessary for each beneficiary to meet the residence requirements in order to remain eligible to adjust.
The officer may approve an adjustment application that was pending when the qualifying relative died if:
The applicant meets the residency requirement; 
The applicant meets all other adjustment requirements.
INA 204(l) does not limit or waive any eligibility requirements or adjustment bars that apply, other than the lack of a qualifying relative due to death. Therefore, the applicant must have been eligible to apply for adjustment at the time the application was filed and at final adjudication, including visa availability and admissibility.  In addition, the applicant must not be barred from adjusting status. 
For example, the death of the qualifying relative does not relieve an applicant seeking adjustment under INA 245(a) of the need to establish a lawful inspection and admission or inspection and parole, among other requirements for 245(a) adjustment. 
Therefore, if at the time the qualifying relative died, the beneficiary had not yet filed for adjustment, the beneficiary may only apply once the underlying petition is approved or reinstated. However, if at the time the qualifying relative died, there was a properly filed adjustment application pending and the beneficiary was eligible to adjust, approval or reinstatement of an approved underlying petition preserves any eligibility for adjustment that existed immediately before the qualifying relative died.
INA 204(l) may benefit applicants who seek adjustment based on a derivative asylum grant, as a derivative T nonimmigrant, or as a derivative U nonimmigrant.  Any one of these aliens may still be eligible for adjustment in light of INA 204(l), despite the death of the qualifying relative. However, the applicant must still establish eligibility for adjustment, apart from the qualifying relative’s death.
INA 204(l) does not automatically waive any ground of inadmissibility that may apply to an adjustment applicant.  The applicant must be admissible, or must obtain a waiver of inadmissibility or other form of relief available, before adjustment may be granted.
Affidavit of Support and Public Charge Considerations 
The death of the qualifying relative does not relieve the applicant of the need to have a valid and enforceable Affidavit of Support (Form I-864), if required.  The Affidavit of Support establishes that the sponsored applicant is not likely to become a public charge and therefore is not inadmissible on such ground. 
If the petitioner dies, the applicant typically must obtain a substitute sponsor to continue to be eligible for adjustment of status. A substitute sponsor is needed even if the deceased petitioner has completed a Form I-864.
However, the death of the principal beneficiary has no bearing, by itself, on the sufficiency of the Affidavit of Support. In these cases, if the Affidavit of Support has not been filed but is required, then the original petitioner must still file an Affidavit of Support for the derivative applicants to be able to adjust.
Effect of Death of Qualifying Relative on Waiver Adjudication
Even though INA 204(l) does not impact adjustment requirements related to admissibility and waivers, the provision does “remove ineligibility based solely on the lack of a qualifying family relationship.” Since INA 204(l) affects not only the visa petition and adjustment application but also any related application, USCIS has determined that INA 204(l) provides the discretion to grant a waiver or other form of relief from inadmissibility to a qualifying applicant, even if the qualifying relationship that would have supported the waiver has ended through death. It is not necessary for the waiver or other relief application to have been pending when the qualifying relative died.
A waiver or other relief application may be approved despite the death of the qualifying relative if:
A petition or adjustment application was pending or approved when the qualifying relative died; and
The applicant meets the residency requirement. 
If a pending petition or application to which INA 204(l) applies is denied despite INA 204(l), the applicant may not obtain approval of a waiver or other relief under INA 204(l).
Some waivers require a showing of extreme hardship to a qualifying relative, who must be either a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident (LPR). Since the legislation intends to have INA 204(l) extend not only to the approval of the pending petition, but also to any related applications, the fact that the qualifying relative has died should be noted in the waiver decision. If the qualifying relative who died is the same qualifying relative to whom extreme hardship must be established in order to grant a waiver, USCIS treats the qualifying relative’s death as the functional equivalent of a finding of extreme hardship. However, for this to apply, the deceased relative must have been a U.S. citizen or LPR at the time of death. 
A finding of extreme hardship permits, but does not compel, a favorable exercise of discretion.  As with any other discretionary waiver application, the officer should weigh the favorable factors against any adverse factors. Extreme hardship is just one positive factor to be weighed in the discretionary determination.  The conduct that made the alien inadmissible is itself an adverse factor.  For example, if the alien is inadmissible based on criminal grounds, the officer considers the nature, seriousness, and underlying circumstances of the crime to determine the weight given to this adverse factor.
If an adjustment applicant would have received permanent residence on a conditional basis due to the recent nature of the marriage to the petitioning spouse, but the petitioning spouse dies before adjustment is granted, then the adjustment applicant should receive permanent residence without condition.
Even if the adjustment applicant obtained conditional permanent residence, the fact that the marriage was terminated due to death would make the applicant eligible to apply for a waiver of certain requirements associated with conditional permanent resident (CPR) status.  The officer may grant an eligible applicant permanent residence without conditions if the officer determines the marriage was bona fide and entered into in good faith while the qualifying relative was alive. 
INA 204(l) gives USCIS discretion to deny a petition or application that may be approved despite the qualifying relative’s death if USCIS finds, as a matter of discretion, that approval would not be in the public interest.  This exercise of discretion is unreviewable. 
Before denying a visa petition or adjustment application as a matter of discretion on the ground that approval would not be in the public interest, an officer must consult with the appropriate USCIS headquarters office or directorate through appropriate channels.
Consultation is not required if the officer will deny the case solely on the traditional discretionary factors that would have applied to the particular case, even if the qualifying relative were still alive. For example, fraud or criminal grounds of inadmissibility that have not or cannot be waived, or security grounds, may warrant denial as a matter of discretion under ordinary circumstances. Consultation is not required in such a case.
INA 204(l) does not require USCIS to reopen or reconsider any decision denying a petition or application, if the denial had already become final before October 28, 2009. For a case denied before that date, an applicant may file (with proper fee) an untimely motion to reopen the petition, adjustment application, or waiver application that was denied if INA 204(l) allows approval of a still-pending petition or application.
The applicant should present new evidence, including:
Proof of the relative’s death;
Proof that the applicant was residing in the United States when the relative died; and
Proof that the applicant continues to reside in the United States.
If the applicant establishes the proof required, an officer may favorably exercise discretion to reopen the petition or application, and make a new decision in light of the law.
An alien present in the United States unlawfully does not accrue unlawful presence while a properly filed adjustment application is pending. If USCIS grants a motion to reopen a denied adjustment application under this section, the application will be pending again and is deemed to be pending from the original date of filing. Therefore, reopening an adjustment application under INA 204(l) will cure any unlawful presence that may have accrued between the original denial and the new decision. The result is that the applicant will not have accrued any unlawful presence from the original filing of the adjustment application until there is a final decision.
If the applicant is otherwise inadmissible because of unlawful presence accrued before applying for adjustment, the applicant must seek a waiver or other form of relief to address the inadmissibility. 
2. [^] See Section 568(d) of Pub. L. 111-83 (PDF), 123 Stat. 2142, 2187 (October 28, 2009). See INA 204(l). The law does not expressly define the “qualifying relative.” From the list of aliens to whom the new INA 204(l) applies, however, USCIS infers that “qualifying relative” means a person who, immediately before death was: (1) the petitioner in an immediate relative or family-based immigrant visa petition under INA 201(b)(2)(A)(i) or INA 203(a); or (2) the principal beneficiary in a widow(er)’s immediate relative or family-based visa petition case under INA 201(b)(2)(A)(i) or INA 203(a).
3. [^] INA 204(l) applies to cases filed before October 28, 2009, and cases in which the qualifying relative died before October 28, 2009, as long as the case is adjudicated on or after October 28, 2009.
9. [^] The surviving derivative beneficiaries may retain the classification and priority date from the underlying petition and adjust status despite the principal beneficiary’s death.
11. [^] If the qualifying relative is the principal beneficiary, the officer should also ensure the underlying petition has not been withdrawn by the petitioner. Although INA 204(l) allows a derivative beneficiary the ability to continue to seek adjustment despite the death of the principal beneficiary, INA 204(l) does not require the petitioner to continue to sponsor the applicant. An immigrant visa petitioner may withdraw a pending petition at any time before the admission or adjustment of the beneficiary. See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(6).
21. [^] If an applicant was not eligible to receive a waiver because the applicant did not have the requisite U.S. citizen or LPR qualifying relative, INA 204(l) would not make the applicant eligible.
No appendices available at this time.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is updating and incorporating relevant Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) content into the USCIS Policy Manual. As that process is ongoing, USCIS has moved any remaining AFM content to its corresponding USCIS Policy Manual Part, in PDF format, until relevant AFM content has been properly incorporated into the USCIS Policy Manual. To the extent that a provision in the USCIS Policy Manual conflicts with remaining AFM content or Policy Memoranda, the updated information in the USCIS Policy Manual prevails. To find remaining AFM content, see the crosswalk (PDF) between the AFM and the Policy Manual.
This technical update replaces all instances of the term “foreign national” with “alien” throughout the Policy Manual as used to refer to a person who meets the definition provided in INA 101(a)(3) [“any person not a citizen or national of the United States”].
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is updating policy guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual to remove references to Biographic Information (Form G-325A).
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is issuing policy guidance addressing the general policies and procedures of adjustment of status as well as adjustment under section 245(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).